 Posted 4/17/2008 5:23:09 AM
|
|
|
|
I think that the issue , is worth a discussion..
That is a lot of images?? Even when I first began with all of my enthusiasm and desire to make it through the pool ( I did not understand for a little while about the time necessary to assess each image) I couldnt manage voting on that many images..
It really is advisable to take more time with voting..
I may not always be wRIGHTbut I am never wrong Profile -  Top 24 - 
|
|
|
Posted 4/17/2008 5:58:12 AM
|
|
|
|
snapdragon (4/17/2008)
Richard IMO you should not have used a thread I started to help some oneby name names ,this is not cool , no matter what point you are trying to make please take it up with admin.This is not the way to do it I would think that you would know better than this . Shocked to say the least .
The image has been archived. The image, comments, voting record and most importantly, the responses to comments are available for public display.
There are some issues here, which are important.
1. Speed voting in large quantity by the new member.
2. A vote of "7" by a heavy weighted voter on this image.
3. Response attitude to constructive criticism comments.
In my opinion, the importance of the issues above justify the link to the image.
 My Top 24
|
|
|
Posted 4/17/2008 1:38:36 PM
|
|
|
|
[quote]snapdragon (4/17/2008)
Richard IMO you should not have used a thread I started to help some one quote]Connie, I don't understand what is there to help someone who was openly aggressive to you by mocking on a mistake in the writing of a sentence. Your comment was perfectly clear, and of course she might have asked to you to be more specific on what you meant by "fixed" but not to be ironic on a minor writing mistake.
|
|
|
Posted 4/17/2008 6:05:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Jorge (4/17/2008)
[quote]snapdragon (4/17/2008)
Richard IMO you should not have used a thread I started to help some one quote]Connie, I don't understand what is there to help someone who was openly aggressive to you by mocking on a mistake in the writing of a sentence. Your comment was perfectly clear, and of course she might have asked to you to be more specific on what you meant by "fixed" but not to be ironic on a minor writing mistake.  Well let me try to explain I did not find her responce to be openly aggressive . I honestly felt she was a newbie and did not understand what I was trying to tell her . I am well known for my so called writing mistakes .This site I have been repeatedly told is about helping others with RFC , her responce to my reply certenly did not bother me other than the fact that she did not understand me ,and that is why I started this post not because I felt she was mocking me but because I wanted to help her . Then all of a sudden my thread on How do I respond turns into something I did not start or want to be part of . We were all newbies at one time ,and all needed a little help .
|
|
|
Posted 4/17/2008 6:37:58 PM
|
|
|
|
snapdragon (4/17/2008)
[quote][b]...We were all newbies at one time ,and all needed a little help .
Stop! Wait! As soon as someone votes more than 2900 times on the image pool, they are no longer newbies.
Once a member/user has exhausted the voting pool and placed their opinion on all the active images, less the buffer, then they are no longer newbies. And, we should hold these speed voting obsessive/compulsive types to some kind of standard. All we know about the person in question is that they don't understand retinal reflection. I always enthusiastically welcome all new members! But, people who vote with mega-speed, in such a short period of time, do need to establish their credibility with the membership... before we can discern with whom we are communing. I'm so sorry to be skeptical, but .... to paraphrase the Prez of the US ( for what he was trying to say.... )
Burn me once, shame on you; Burn me twice, shame on me!
My Top 24
|
|
|
Posted 4/18/2008 2:21:52 AM
|
|
|
|
hahn23 (4/17/2008)
snapdragon (4/17/2008)
[quote][b]...We were all newbies at one time ,and all needed a little help .Stop! Wait! As soon as someone votes more than 2900 times on the image pool, they are no longer newbies. Once a member/user has exhausted the voting pool and placed their opinion on all the active images, less the buffer, then they are no longer newbies.  this reminds me of the song "Don't Blink " you age way too fast that way  .Is DA now changing the meaning of new member ? I do believe I read (1) speed voting by a new member . Is there a way to end or archive a thread once it has taken on a whole new agenda ?
|
|
|
Posted 4/18/2008 7:07:50 AM
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon, I think that you should have received an email when she replied to your comment. That email should have the name of the image on it. You can use the search function to find that image and then, of, course, leave another message. Since time has passed and more comments left, it might be a good idea to make reference to the first comment to clarify.
_________________________ HappySnap's Profile
I like poetry, long walks on the beach, and pokin' dead things with a stick.
|
|
|
Posted 4/18/2008 7:34:22 AM
|
|
|
|
HappySnaps (4/18/2008)
Snapdragon, I think that you should have received an email when she replied to your comment. That email should have the name of the image on it. You can use the search function to find that image and then, of, course, leave another message. Since time has passed and more comments left, it might be a good idea to make reference to the first comment to clarify. Thanks Happy Snaps for thisvery helpful info it is I was looking for , how to (contact so I could respond) to a misunderstood reply on RFC I had given on a RFC.
|
|
|
Posted 4/18/2008 7:43:30 AM
|
|
|
| | |
