﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>DA Photo Contest Forum / Photography / Photography Discussion  / Critiqueing Magazine Photos / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>DA Photo Contest Forum</description><link>http://www.dailyawards.com/DAForum/</link><webMaster>info@dailyawards.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:00:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Critiqueing Magazine Photos</title><link>http://www.dailyawards.com/DAForum/Topic23022-14-1.aspx</link><description>Congratulations on your Shutterbug coup!  You know, there is a large subjective element at work in all photography.  We might both read the same book (by Charles Dickens), and have completely different assessments, even though the book might be considered a "classic."  I don't expect that to ever change at DA.  Even though there are composition "rules,"  some are made to be broken.  For my part, I think that my exposure to the wide range of styles here has been the greatest influence on my thinking and my photography.</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:20:11 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Stormhaven</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Critiqueing Magazine Photos</title><link>http://www.dailyawards.com/DAForum/Topic23022-14-1.aspx</link><description>&lt;TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class=BigTxt vAlign=top&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN id=ctl02_ctlTopic_ctlPanelBar_ctlTopicsRepeater_ctl04_lblFullMessage&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;IMO, DA has some of the world's best photographers.  Since my intro to digital photography, I've become more interested in the shots found in any magazine, and frankly, I believe that many of their photos would fail to make the grade at DA.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT color=#3333dd&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can attest that the caliber of competition here is of high quality.  I have had several images published in magazines and in fact have an image in this month's (April) issue of &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Shutterbug&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; magazine in their "City at Night" competition.  The exact same image is in competition here right now.  The editors of &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Shutterbug&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; liked the shot but the editors here...not so much.  I'm not complaining, just commenting on the great quality of images here.</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:56:43 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>TV</dc:creator></item><item><title>Critiqueing Magazine Photos</title><link>http://www.dailyawards.com/DAForum/Topic23022-14-1.aspx</link><description>IMO, DA has some of the world's best photographers.  Since my intro to digital photography, I've become more interested in the shots found in any magazine, and frankly, I believe that many of their photos would fail to make the grade at DA.  I receive a number of magazines of different types, and I frequently ask myself, "&lt;EM&gt;How would this do at Daily Awards?"&lt;/EM&gt;  For instance, take a look at the April/o8 Popular Photography pages 24 (tarantula), 47, and 50.   I just can't imagine these shots earning Daily, Monthly or Annual awards here.  I'll stack my DA "heroes" up against some of the most reknowned photographers anywhere. </description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:39:31 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Stormhaven</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>